patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Controversial Mural on Metropolitan Parkway - Do You Love It or Hate It?

A new mural on Metropolitan has been stirring up anger and all sorts of reactions for 4 days now.

 

What is your opinion of the new mural on Metropolitan Parkway?  Tempers boiled over Monday afternoon when Councilwoman Cleta Winslow held a press conference in-front of the mural. Atlanta Police made the decision to break up the conference as both sides began getting more and more agitated by the other sides complaints.

Community members seem to agree that they do not like the painting of a snake-like dragon eating a man, and want to paint over it.  Someone even already started to paint over a portion of it.  On the other side of the argument is the organization that is responsible for painting the artwork, Living Walls.  They say that it is a great piece and that an artist from France traveled to SW Atlanta to paint this work for the community.

Reporting done by CBS Atlanta, who was at the heated press conference on Monday, shows a number of community members that are almost disgusted by the artwork.  One person in the CBS story said that it reminds people of a "serpent" and "serpents represent evil."

So what is your opinion of the mural?

  • Mural on Metopolitan Pkwy - Love It or Hate It?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Love It
        7 (50%)
    • Hate It
        7 (50%)
    Total votes: 14
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Metropolitan Parkway and mural controversy

Brian Ross

9:55 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I think it's beautiful and edgy.The symbol of the man being consumed mostly represents what will happen if we don't take care of our world or it could mean man being changed by nature for the good.Death is symbolically regeneration and going to the next level.

Reply

Todd Smith

10:02 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Thank you!!! Brain Ross some communities will never change even if you change the street name. Its art!!!! Everyone has there own interpretation. Instead of raising hell about a well done mural in your community why dont you raise hell about all the crime in the community, then maybe I could listen to Cleta Winslow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Ross

10:17 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

She has mostly been a talking head on the issue of crime.She was also once my landlord.

Todd Smith

10:22 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I am very familiar with Cleta Winslow as a councilperson!!!! She is exactly a talking head because nothing has changed!!!

Reply

Liv Nyankori

10:56 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I love this piece of artwork. To me is it Dali like. My 9 year old loves it. She even spent her half day off of school last Friday scrubbing the illegally put up gray paint that off the mural. It was all hand done and I am so saddened by the issues of late. I think many people love and support it but the angry voices of a few are the only being heard.

Reply

Jamekaa F

11:03 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this mural! It's beautiful and represents so much more than the one dimensional notion that most people think it does. Snakes also represent transformation, patience, dualism and endless recreation! Most people only refer to the "evil" side due to their indoctrination of religion, primarily Christianity.

This mural shouldn't be taken down at all...instead, people need to be awakened to alternative viewpoints and representations of nature, life and human/animal dynamism and linkages!

Reply
Comment_arrow

T. Leslie

1:31 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Jamekaa F should we not respect religious Freedoms even if one is a Christians

NPU-T RESIDENT

11:47 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

We are so consumed with preventing crime in the area that we forget the beauty of art!

Reply
Comment_arrow

T. Leslie

1:30 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The approach to true redevelopment has to be comprehensive--

Patch_comments_icon

Marc Richardson

1:24 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The artwork definitely shows the artists talent. But, I think community members in the immediate area need to have a say in deciding what sort of art installments go in their community. There are the one that will have to see it and pass by it everyday. Even though I trust many of us have a great taste and an eye for art, I wouldn't want a stranger to have control over what art I have on the walls at my home, and neighborhoods are extensions of our homes. The problem really seems to be that neighbors are not being made aware of City plans for our community.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy N Sery

11:34 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Marc,
From my understanding Living Walls muralists have to write a proposal and get their ideas approved by the community. Who the approving members are, I do not know.
Amy

T. Leslie

1:29 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

As a resident of NPU-V which includes, Adair Park, Pittsburgh, Mechanisville, Summerhill, Capital Gateway and Peoplestown, and to address some of the issues read today, by simply stateting that no one has told me they don't consider the Mural non-artistic. Most are in agreement that the (Wall) should not remaine, blank. The problem (is) the established CDC, and/or the Civil organization were not properly notified. The protocol for these neighborhood is to assist in the re-development of their history and the once magnificent Lacacy of the Pittsburgh Community. One criminal does not mean all are criminals, come out and meet your neighbors in the community meetings. Travie Leslie

Reply

BBurson

7:42 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Since people think it is so artistic then put it on the North side of town. The community should have been informed and had the opportuntity to vote through their NPU.

Reply

Todd Smith

9:54 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

@ T. Leslie and BBruson Yes, Pittsburgh was once a great community but as a whole we have many other issues to address today outside of the mural. You are fighting the wrong battle, my entire family is from Pittsburgh and they are even scared to visit there old neighborhood. "Since people think it is so artistic then put it on the North side of town" these types of statements are exactly why crime is very high and property values are depressed over there.

Reply

annette samuels

10:58 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Being a resident of Pittburgh all my life, its is always a good thing to see a positive change, but as previously noted the community should have been advised. I watch the artist each day as the mural was being painted and the artist would wave as you pass by but no one ever attempted to let the community know what was going on. Once again someone else is deciding what is good for us, that is not our fault if we did not know.

Reply

Nia Knowles

9:40 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Was the community not involved with the selection of the piece? Usually there is a panel...? No matter how beautiful it is, the purpose is missed if the community does not embrace it.

Reply

Darin Bohm

9:37 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

The Living Walls Roti mural is actually on University Ave not Metropolitan. So correcting the street might help frame the conversation and comments.

Reply

MS P

1:55 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

When I first saw the mural, the mental image I got was that the "BIG FISH" is here to eat the "LITTLE FISH" and it is just a matter of Time. ****In other words we are here not to COEXIST, We are here to take over and it is just a matter of time.**** Every community has it's share of problems, but I know that Pittsburgh is and has always been a very proud community and they should never be left out of any decision making process.

Reply

Larry

7:53 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

My first thought...Wow, what a waste of money in these hard times!

Reply

Todd Smith

11:21 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Its funny how you can get people to rally and agrue against a mural but in the same community people can not rally to control crime in there own neighborhood. People in the area know the people who commit crimes in the area on a daily basis but say nothing, people know of known drug houses but turn and look the other way and the same community allows vagrants and people to hangout all times of the day in front of a liquor store. WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A SAY SO ABOUT A MURAL YOU CAN NOT EVEN POLICE OR TAKE CARE OF YOUR OWN COMMUNITY!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

MS P

1:33 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

It's also funny how one can say that people in the community don't care. I agree that maybe 50% care and 50% don't. I want to live where you are because it seems that only you care 100%. The police know where the drug houses are, just like the community does (oftentimes people are afraid) and so I assume you do too. Since you care 100% and it takes only to get the ball rolling, roll the ball. Loitering is a policeable offense so that could be easily handled. I recently wondered how the loitering issue was handled on the northside because I really don't see that problem there. Maybe south precincts should talk to north precincts. ONE HAS A RIGHT TO SAY WHAT GOES ON IN THEIR COMMUNITY BUT YOU MUST always INCLUDE THEM IN THE CONVERSATION.

BBurson

10:23 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

@ Todd Smith: Thank-you for your response Todd. First of all I have a lot of battles on my plate. I attend NPU meetings, I vote, I clean-up my communties, I own property, participate on the crime & safety committee ect. I am sure you do the same and I am still willing to do even more. We all have a say.

Reply

Leave a comment